Cit vs mysore chromite ltd
WebCIT v. Mysore Chromite Ltd. (1955) 1 SCR 849 : AIR 1955 SC 98. 37. P.S.N.S. Ambalavana Chettiar v. Express Newspapers Ltd. (1968) 2 SCR 239 : AIR 1968 SC 741. 38. Agricultural Market Committee v. Shalimar Chemical Works Ltd. (1997) 5 SCC 516 : AIR 1997 SC 2502. 39. Pearson v. WebJul 27, 2015 · Podar Cement Private Limited (1997) 226 ITR 625 and Mysore Minerals v CIT 106 Taxman 166 the legal position is no longer res integra. In Podar Cement Private Limited the Supreme Court was called upon to consider whether the income derived by the assessee on the flat or the building were income from other sources and not income from …
Cit vs mysore chromite ltd
Did you know?
WebJan 14, 2013 · In the opinion of the CIT (Appeals), the language used in the rules clearly specified that enhanced depreciation allowance is available only when the trucks are used in the business of running them on hire also. The appellant has only a leasing business and it does not run a business of hiring trucks to the public. WebMysore Chromite Ltd. (27 ITR 128)(SC), the Supreme court held that the property in the goods passed in London where the bill of lading was handed over to the buyer’s bank …
Web2 I.C.D.S Ltd v. CIT [2013] 29 taxmann.com 129 (SC) The Supreme Court in the case of Poddar Cement (P.) Ltd.3 and Mysore Minerals Ltd.4 observed that it is the beneficial ownership and not the titular ownership that is relevant for a valid claim of depreciation allowance under the Act. However, in the instant case, the Supreme Court WebMysore Chromite Ltd . (1) held that in respect of the five cases in which the assessee drew the bills in favour of the buyers the sales were effected in Pakistan whereas in the two cases in which the bills were drawn in favour of the assessee's agent at Calcutta, the sales were effected in India. (1) 27 I.T.R. 128. 140
WebMysore Chromite Limited . Case Information CITATION CODES citation codes CASE NO. On Appeal from the Judgment and Order dated the 29th day of March, 1951 of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Case Referred No. 44 of 1948.,Civil Appeal No. 117 of 1953, decided on 1st day of November, 1954 ATTORNEY(S) WebJan 14, 2013 · In the opinion of the CIT (Appeals), the language used in the rules clearly specified that enhanced depreciation allowance is available only when the trucks are …
Websentative of some of the Indian chromite deposits in Andhra, Bihar, Orissa, Mysore and Madras, and include one specimen from Baluchistan in Pakistan. The location of the …
WebVodafone Essar Cellular Ltd. Assistant CIT, 2010 Tax LR, 618 (Ker) 14. State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. ... CIT V/s Mysore Chromite Ltd.; 1955, 1 SCR 849. 2. Badri Prasad V/s State of M.P.; 1965, 3 SCR 381. 3. ... The Mogu Liner Ltd. Vs. Manipal Printers and Publishers Pvt. Ltd. AIR 1991 Ker, 183 5. Indian Airlines Vs. determine pitch of screwWebApr 29, 2011 · Cited By: 1. Coram: 1. ...concluded by a decision of this Court in IT Ref. No. 312 of 1961 in the case of CIT vs. Bharat Sugar Mills Ltd., judgment wherein was...of this Court in IT Ref. No. 166 of 1985 in the case of CIT vs. New India Sugar Mills judgment wherein was delivered on 12th April, 1990...assessee. 5. chunky soup commercial football player 2018WebCIT vs Divine Leasing and Finance Ltd., General Exports and Credits Ltd., Lovely Exports (P) Ltd. Citation 299 ITR 268 197 Taxation 43 158 Taxman 440 207 CTR 38 LexReported COCA-COLA EXPORT CORPORATION vs ITO and ANR.Applied 231 ITR 200 CIT vs Stellar Investment Ltd Distinguished and explained 192 ITR 287 Nirma Industries Ltd. … chunky solid milk chocolateWebJan 11, 2024 · Relaxation Of The Penalty under Section 271DA For Violation Of Section 269ST Of The Income Tax Act 1961. The Finance Act 2024 introduced a new section 269ST w.e.f. 01.04.17 as follows –. “no person shall receive an amount of two lakh rupees or more—. (a) in aggregate from a person in a day; or. determine polarity of compoundWebThe Commissioner of Income-Tax, Madras Vs. Mysore Chromite Limited [1954] INSC 106 (1 November 1954) DAS, SUDHI RANJAN MAHAJAN, MEHAR CHAND (CJ) HASAN, GHULAM BHAGWATI, NATWARLAL H. Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 (Act XI of 1922), s. 4-Profits derived by the assesseeWhether arose or were received in British Indian in the … chunky solid oak extending dining tableWebMar 11, 2011 · Mysore Minerals Ltd. (2) 2001 250 ITR...725 Kar This was a case in respect of mining of granite. The Division Bench held that it would amount to manufacture relying on an earlier judgment in CIT v. Mysore Minerals Ltd. (1... Deputy Commissioner Of … chunky soup nutritionWebA Note on State of Madras v. Ramalingam & Co., A.I.R. 1956 Mad. 695 - Mahalinga Padmanabhan - There would seem to be a conflict between this decision and the one reported in Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras v. Mysore Chromite Ltd., (S) AIR 1955 SC 98. The main point in controversy is whether the paying or negotiating or the … determine polarity in bonds